|
SUPPORT
THE LIPINSKI-DOOLEY-THOMAS-FLETCHER
ACCESS AMENDMENT
August 1, 2001
The Honorable Dennis Hastert
The U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515
Dear Representative Hastert:
Recently, Congressmen Ganske,
Dingell and Norwood re-introduced their patient's "rights"
legislation, H.R. 2563 with the addition of so-called
"access" provisions. We believe these provisions will do
little, if anything, to address the very real and threatening
problem that uninsured Americans face in attempting to purchase
affordable health insurance.
The Ganske/Dingell/Norwood
bill ignores true reform options that would put small business on
equal footing with big business and labor unions when it comes to
purchasing health insurance. Association Health Plan (AHP)
legislation, as included in the Fletcher bill, would allow small
businesses to greatly expand their purchasing clout and economies of
scale by banding together across state lines through bona fide trade
and professional associations. AHP legislation enjoys bipartisan
support in the House of Representatives and allows for common-sense
reforms that do not resort to welfare handouts or government
mandates that increase health coverage. By simply allowing the
market to work, AHPs will provide America's small businesses, which
struggle to provide any kind of health insurance to their employees,
more affordable options.
In contrast, the Ganske/Dingell/Norwood
bill now contains so-called "Health Benefit Purchasing
Coalitions" (HBPCs). This half-hearted attempt at increasing
access will do virtually nothing to help small businesses afford
health insurance. HBPCs do not allow small businesses to operate
independent of insurance companies and provide none of the
purchasing clout and cost savings that AHPs bring. In addition,
state-based purchasing coalitions similar to HBPCs are already in
existence and have not been successful in expanding coverage to
small business due to excessive regulation and lack of uniformity.
Additionally, the Ganske/Dingell/Norwood
proposal to expand Medical Savings Accounts (MSAs) neither improves
nor truly expands them. H.R. 2563, in fact, makes MSAs merely
available for an additional two years and allows employers of up to
100 to participate. These changes fall short of those necessary to
expand this important option to more Americans who cannot afford
traditional insurance plans.
In contrast, the Lipinski/Dooley/Thomas/Fletcher
amendment improves both the workability of MSAs and expands their
availability to more Americans. The amendment allows for lower
deductibles, for both employers and employees to contribute more to
the accounts, and most importantly, it modifies the arbitrary
participation limits so that more Americans can participate.
Unfortunately, in comparison, the Ganske/Dingell/Norwood bill does
little to help expand MSAs as an alternative to encouraging a
doctor-patient relationship that is free from HMO interference.
In summary, the Ganske/Dingell/Norwood
access provisions do not address the real problem with health
insurance - skyrocketing costs - and will do little to help more
Americans afford health insurance. Meaningful access provisions are
particularly critical given the cost increases expected from
enactment of patients' rights legislation and given the consecutive
years of double-digit premium increases for small employers. We urge
you to support the much-needed Lipinski/Dooley/Thomas/Fletcher
amendment.
Sincerely,
American
Association of Engineering Societies
American Farm Bureau Federation
American Road and Transportation Builders
Association American Society of Association Executives
Associated Builders and Contractors Grassroots Impact, Inc.
Hispanic Business Roundtable
Independent Insurance Agents of America
Independent Office Products & Furniture Dealers Association
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers - United States
of America
National Association of Home Builders
National Association of Manufacturers
National Association for the Self-Employed
National Association of Wholesaler-Distributors
National Association of Women Business Owners
National Council of Agricultural Employers
National Federation of Independent Business
National Lumber and Building Material Dealers Association
National Restaurant Association
National Retail Federation
National Roofing Contractors Association
National Society of Professional Engineers
Self Insurance Institute of America
The American Council of Engineering Companies
The Latino Coalition
The Professional Golfers' Association of America
Tire Association of North America
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Western Growers Association
Women in Public Policy
(Sample
of Letter Sent to
U.S. House of Representatives) |