 |
Promoting
Electrotechnology Careers and Public Policy |
14 July 2000
Senator Orrin Hatch
United States Senate
131 Russell Building
Washington, DC 20510
Dear Senator Hatch:
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers-United States of America (IEEE-USA) and the 220,000 electrical, electronics, and
computer engineers who are U.S. members of the IEEE oppose the allocation of fees
collected for the U.S Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) as passed by the House of
Representatives in the House Commerce-Justice-State appropriations bill (H.R.4690). If
adopted, $295 million of USPTO fees would be diverted to fund other federal agencies. This
diversion will force the USPTO to operate with 25% less than the total of fees paid by
their patent and trademark applicants. As a result, the USPTO will have to reduce the size
of its staff or increase the fees it collects.
- If the USPTO reduces the size of its staff,
trademark registrations and patents will take longer to issue, and the US technology
industry will be injured by the delay. The capital formation markets that are so important
to our technology industries abhor uncertainty. It is generally more difficult to access
capital markets without intellectual property protection when compared to a company that
is protected by patents and trademark registrations. Any delay in the issuance of patents
and trademark registration will injure the ability of technology industries to access
their capital markets for expansion capital.
- On the other hand, if patent and trademark
registration applicants are required to pay higher fees in order to fund the diversion of
money to unrelated government agencies, fewer applications for patents and trademark
registrations will be filed. The number of patents filed each year is more than a gauge of
the state of technology, it is an inducement for others to innovate, to design around
existing patents, and to lay claim to new technologies. This very inducement is at least
partially responsible for the growth of the American economy. Alan Greenspan often speaks
of how technology has been able to hold down inflation. Raising taxes on the technology
innovators through increased patent and trademark fees will injure the economy.
- The Patent and Trademark system serves to reduce
the risks of commercial ventures. By diverting fees collected by the USPTO, Congress would
be reintroducing risks into the new and innovative technology ventures, either by delaying
the issuance of patents and trademark registrations (if the USPTO reduces staff) or by
reducing the number of applications filed (if the USPTO raises the fees collected to make
up for the diversion of funds).
IEEE-USA supports appropriate levels of public and
private funding of both the public functions (dissemination of patents) and private
functions (examination of applications) of the USPTO. The U.S. Congress should fund the
USPTO's public functions, such as classifying, archiving, indexing, maintaining the patent
library and associated patent depositories, and its general administration. Individual
users should also pay for the USPTO's private functions, such as processing applications
for patent and trademark registrations and other individual requests.
These structural changes notwithstanding, IEEE-USA
opposes the reduction of the USPTO's operating budget and urges the Senate to restore the
levels to the appropriate amount.
Thank you for your consideration. Should you have
questions or seek further information on our positions, please contact Bill Williams at
202-785-0017.
Sincerely,
Merrill W. Buckley, Jr.
President, IEEE-USA
Glenn Tenney
Chair, IEEE-USA Intellectual Property Committee
(Sample of Letter Sent
to Key Senate Appropriators)
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics
Engineers - United States of America
1828 L Street, N.W., Suite 1202, Washington, DC 20036-5104
Office: (202) 785-0017 * Fax: (202) 785-0835 * E-mail: ieeeusa@ieee.org
| Top of Page | Policy Log | Public Policy Forum
| IEEE-USA |
Last Update 14 July 2000
Staff Contact: Vin O'Neill, v.oneill@ieee.org
Copyright © 2000, The
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
Permission to copy IEEE-USA policy communications is granted for non-commercial uses with
appropriate attribution, unless otherwise indicated.
|