Commission
Assesses the Future of By Vin O'Neill The Commission on the Future of the US Aerospace Industry was established pursuant to the FY 01 Defense Authorization Act (PL 106-398) as enacted on October 30, 2000. Its purpose to study the U.S. aerospace industry in the global economy and to assess its future importance for U.S. economic and national security. The Commission is composed of 12 members: six appointed by the President; two each by the House and Senate Majority Leaders and one each by the House and Senate Minority Leaders. Former Congressman Robert Walker (R-PA) chairs the Commission. Members include representatives from trade associations and labor unions including the Aerospace Industries Association, the General Aviation Manufacturers Association and the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers. The Commission holds periodic meetings and makes interim recommendations on critical issues that warrant immediate attention by Congress and the Administration. It will issue a final report in November 2002. Highlights of November 2001 Public Meeting The Commission held its first public meeting at the US Department of Commerce in November 27, 2001 and took testimony from White House OSTP Director John Marburger, Congressman Dave Weldon (R-FL) and senior executives from several Federal departments and agencies. It concluded that Federal aerospace spending is currently spread across multiple agency budgets with oversight by numerous Congressional committees. None has an integrated view of the condition of the nation's aerospace industry. Commissioners directed OMB, the Department of Commerce and the CBO to assemble comprehensive baseline statistics describing the aerospace industry using spending breakouts from the President's FY03 Budget Request and current industry economic performance and investment expenditure profiles. Highlights of Feb. 2002 Public Meeting At a meeting on February 12th, the Commission took testimony from industry and government witnesses on aerospace investment, air transportation infrastructure and export controls issues and made the following recommendations:
Highlights of May 2002 Public Meeting On May 14, 2002 the Commission took testimony from government, industry, educator and student witnesses on space exploration, industrial base and workforce issues and made the following recommendations:
Aerospace Industry Workforce Issues Commissioners and witnesses contend that the industry faces serious workforce challenges. Consolidations and down-sizing resulted in the loss of nearly 500,000 jobs during the 1990's. The average age of production workers is 44 in the commercial sector and 53 in defense. Between 20 and 30 percent of engineering and skilled production workers are expected to retire within five years. The industry is perceived as being overly bureaucratic and lacking in exciting technological challenges by engineering students, many of whom are taking jobs in other industries. Substantive reforms will require increases in the profitability of aerospace firms and favorable tax policies. In addition, aerospace firms must dedicate more resources to the financing of technical education and develop more flexible workforce utilization policies. Loan forgiveness for students who agree to pursue careers in the industry and a national apprenticeship training program should also be considered. In response to workforce challenges, the Commission has made the following recommendations:
Labor backed recommendations to assess the impact of offsets and outsourcing on domestic aerospace employment and recognize the importance of international labor standards were tabled. Looking Ahead The next public meeting of the Commission will be held at the Commerce Department in Washington on August 22, 2002. More detailed information on the Commission, including member biographies, meeting agendas, testimony and summaries and copies of interim reports are available online at Commission on the Future of the US Aerospace Industry, www.aerospacecommission.gov. | Top of Page | Policy Forum | IEEE-USA | Last updated:
02 May 2005
|